← Search

Anna Catherine Cargile

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 107W–64L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history171 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danele Poole
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Steel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-10-01 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Steel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Murdock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-23 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Steel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-21 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Murdock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Steel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-13 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Barr championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-09 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abby Barr
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Barr
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandi Watts
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Barr
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
63.5%
33W–19L · 59.7% of games
2.75
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 54.5% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 52.7% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
9W–6L · 57.2% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 57.6% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#2 Singles
11%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams