← Search

Jamie Stasko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shelton, CT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 100W–70L · seasons 2018–2024

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history170 matches
L
2024-07-18 · MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Kaya
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-09 · MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Kaya
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-07 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbi Deangelis
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-06-18 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Horvath
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-06-15 · MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Kaya
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-06-09 · MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Kaya
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-05 · MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Kaya
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-06-04 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bastarache
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-06-02 · MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Cooper
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-06-01 · B:NHH:Play it Forward:Sookvaree/Stasko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Haven
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-22 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Horvath
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-18 · B:NHH:Play it Forward:Sookvaree/Stasko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Junjira Sookvaree
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 66.3% of games
3.5
56.2%
54W–42L · 53% of games
4.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
78.1%
25W–7L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams