← Search

Clay Hamlin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodstock, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 56W–38L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history94 matches
W
2026-10-09 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasia Sutton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-25 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasia Sutton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · Wexford (Christopher O'Connell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikas Shah
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · Wexford (Christopher O'Connell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Davis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacia Shea mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-03 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hawley Wetzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Wexford (Christopher O'Connell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikas Shah championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 5-7
W
2026-03-22 · Wexford (Christopher O'Connell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Brown
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-20 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris McCorstin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-17 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with KELLY MORRISON mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · Wexford (Christopher O'Connell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikas Shah
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-25 · Wexford (Christopher O'Connell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Neal
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 63.9% of games
4.0
47.8%
22W–24L · 49.3% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer