← Search

Hawley Wetzel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Roswell, GA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
23 matches · 15W–8L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history23 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Wetzel mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-02 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikas Shah mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clay Hamlin mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Neal mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-17 · Wexford (Michael Forrester)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikas Shah mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2023-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Flowers
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-04-21 · USTA Atlanta/Matthew Steinberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Steinberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-03-31 · USTA Atlanta/Matthew Steinberg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Steinberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
W
2023-03-24 · USTA Atlanta/Matthew Steinberg · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Steinberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-03-13 · USTA Atlanta/Matthew Steinberg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Steinberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-03-10 · USTA Atlanta/Matthew Steinberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Steinberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2022-10-28 · Wexford (Matthew Steinberg)* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Forrester mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 65.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 64.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams