← Search

Henri Pichal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wesley Chapel, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 17W–40L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history57 matches
L
2025-09-13 · McMullen Cribb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffery Erskine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-02 · McMullen Cribb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Cribb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-07 · McMullen Cribb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Greg Barker
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-24 · McMullen Cribb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alan Schiller
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-10 · McMullen Cribb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Juan Rodriguez
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-27 · McMullen Cribb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Juan Rodriguez
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-13 · McMullen Cribb · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alan Schiller
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-06 · McMullen Cribb · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Partida
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-01 · McMullen Cribb · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Allee
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-04 · McMullen Cribb · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Allee
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-20 · McMullen Cribb · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mony Rodon
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-27 · McMullen Cribb · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Cribb
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 23.8% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 40.3% of games
7.5
0%
0W–8L · 28.4% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer