← Search

Kathy Steed

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
355 matches · 216W–139L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history355 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Hempfield Tri Again (Lingenfelter) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Ashwood
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · Hempfield Tri Again (Lingenfelter) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Tait
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · Hempfield GRVTY (Bahn) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vinh Liang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-20 · Hempfield Tri Again (Lingenfelter) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbie Campbell
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-18 · Hempfield SWINGERS (Banh) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Noelle Vahanian
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristle Evans
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Lingenfelter
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophia Duke championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Caporaletti championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophia Duke
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Tait
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Hempfield - Brooks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Wetzel
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 46.7% of games
3.5
66.2%
43W–22L · 54.1% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 53% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games
6.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 56.7% of games
7.0
56.9%
33W–25L · 52.6% of games
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 61.5% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68.8%
53W–24L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
61.7%
37W–23L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
119 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
107 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova