← Search

Christie Mumford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Wolf, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 103W–67L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history170 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Wisehaven - Lamond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JODI SULPIZIO
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-10-31 · Wisehaven - Hollenbaugh / Mumford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hollenbaugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Wisehaven - Michels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Beck
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · Wisehaven - Hollenbaugh / Mumford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hollenbaugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-04 · Wisehaven - Hollenbaugh / Mumford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hollenbaugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · Wisehaven - Michels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laken Kelly
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · Wisehaven - Michels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-02 · Wisehaven - Mumford · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Myers
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · Wisehaven - Michels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JODI SULPIZIO
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-12 · Wisehaven - Michels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Wisehaven - Myers · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · Wisehaven - Myers · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
83.8%
31W–6L · 63.9% of games
3.5
60%
27W–18L · 53.2% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
39.6%
21W–32L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#1 Singles
22%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
36 matches
Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer