← Search

Rachel Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Bern, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
170 matches · 88W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history170 matches
L
2026-09-01 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Hadad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-21 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Game
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane McKeel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · GR - Colie 40s Tri · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Helen Davis
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James McDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · GR - Colie 40s Tri · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kascia Henderson
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James McDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane McKeel
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-10 · EM-Smith (65s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doreen Hyet
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-08 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doreen Hyet
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-02 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doreen Hyet
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.8% of games
3.0
72.3%
34W–13L · 60.4% of games
3.5
36.6%
15W–26L · 45.5% of games
6.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 59.4% of games
7.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 39.5% of games
3.5mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.4% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
46 matches
Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova