← Search

Andie McCasland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Angelo, TX
3.5M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-07-01 · Haire · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Haire · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harold Lamm mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonah Felger mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonah Felger mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent McCasland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer