← Search

Grant Lamkin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pendleton, IN
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 2W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 7.0X MRC Kubek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Vanator mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 7.0X MRC Kubek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Vanator mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 8.0 MRC Vanator · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jessica Mattax mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · Indy X18 8.0 MRC Vanator · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jessica Mattax mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · Indy X18 8.0 MRC Vanator · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jessica Mattax mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · Indy X18 7.0X MRC Kubek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Choey Kubek mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · Indy X18 8.0 MRC Kubek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Makenzie Isaacs mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-06 · Indy X18 8.0 MRC Kubek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Cantwell mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Schicker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Schicker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Correa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brett Tanaka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer