← Search

Kim Groudan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gilbert, AZ
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 19W–26L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history45 matches
L
2025-11-01 · 6.0 MTC Match Makers W55F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-04 · 6.0 MTC Match Makers W55F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Champagne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-01-18 · 6.0 TPR Court Divas W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-12-14 · 6.0 TPR Court Divas W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-11-30 · 6.0 TPR Court Divas W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2023-03-27 · PHX/BergenPilar/65Over/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-03-16 · PHX/BergenPilar/65Over/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-03-02 · PHX/BergenPilar/65Over/6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corey Hart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2023-02-23 · PHX/BergenPilar/65Over/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corey Hart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-02-09 · PHX/BergenPilar/65Over/6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-01-12 · 6.0 CTC Court Divas W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcia Stanczyk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-01-09 · 6.0 CTC Court Divas W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcia Stanczyk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
42.2%
19W–26L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe