← Search

Tiffany Hochet

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spartanburg, SC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 102W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history143 matches
W
2026-07-10 · UPTA18TL/Cooper/Hwy14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Rogers
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · UPTA18M/GTC/Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-07-23 · UPTA40M/Nobles/GTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Mahaffey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-18 · UPTA40M/Nobles/GTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-1
W
2025-06-24 · UPTA40M/Nobles/GTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-06-17 · UPTA40M/Nobles/GTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-10 · UPTA40M/Nobles/GTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-03 · UPTA40M/Nobles/GTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Ramirez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Ramirez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-08-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Milne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-07-09 · UPTA40M/Nobles/Sportsclub · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hochet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 68.6% of games
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 53.6% of games
4.0
55%
11W–9L · 49.6% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 52% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
100%
15W–0L · 70.4% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
100%
21W–0L · 75% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova