← Search

Drew Corontzes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GREENVILLE, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 161W–96L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history257 matches
L
2026-10-24 · UPTA18S/Russell/Kroc · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Engel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimey Kyker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Joyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimey Kyker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · UPTA18T/Russell/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitch Appleby
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Engel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah LaMunion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah LaMunion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · UPTA40A/Gibson/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Green
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · UPTA40A/Gibson/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Green
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.3% of games
3.5
85.7%
24W–4L · 61.3% of games
4.0
59.4%
60W–41L · 52.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.0
95%
19W–1L · 74.3% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.3% of games
8.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.8% of games
8.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 48% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.3% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
52 matches
#1 Singles
15%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
29 matches
Singles
9%
24 matches
#2 Singles
9%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams