← Search

Martha Minson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Honolulu, HI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 6W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history66 matches
L
2026-03-04 · Long Shots · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Esther Monk
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-18 · Long Shots · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Winton
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-04 · Long Shots · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Onomoto
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-06 · OC Senior-itas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arlene Montania
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-23 · OC Senior-itas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Veronica MacDonald
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-22 · OC StarFires · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Kelminski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-15 · OC StarFires · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Esther Monk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-08 · OC StarFires · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Kelminski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-04 · OC StarFires · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arlene Montania
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-01 · OC StarFires · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Esther Monk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2024-08-04 · OC StarFires · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Lingle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-28 · OC StarFires · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Esther Monk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 32.3% of games
6.0
9.5%
4W–38L · 30.1% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0%
0W–8L · 14.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer