← Search

Donna Ambrose

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kailua, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
8 matches · 5W–3L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history8 matches
W
2026-09-05 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Nagamine
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacy Ray
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-23 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Trask
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-08-02 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Trask
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-06 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gwenette Higa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-09-22 · Penn Pals · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacy Ray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-08-11 · Penn Pals · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gwenette Higa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-04 · Penn Pals · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tessa Travers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal