← Search

Linda Match

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mequon, WI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 97W–43L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history140 matches
W
2025-08-03 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Nill championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-07-02 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Godden
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-25 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Brooks
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W GML River Glen Elite Ellegard · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Brooks
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-05-28 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Brooks
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-03-09 · WI Adult 7.5W Winter GML RiverGlen Elite Langerma · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danica Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-16 · WI Adult 7.5W Winter GML RiverGlen Elite Langerma · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Ellegard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-08-11 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Vuchetich championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
Nicole Roberts / Ann Weiner
2024-08-10 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Brooks championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Katie Sieberer / Amy Meyer
2024-08-03 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Godden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Vuchetich championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-29 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5W GML Mequon Elite Melberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Seem
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
73.6%
53W–19L · 59.5% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.7% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54% of games
7.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 64.1% of games
7.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.1% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova