← Search

Kerry Lamoureux

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plymouth, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 36W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history49 matches
W
2026-07-14 · SCWB-Meireles 55s 7.0 W F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · SCWB-Meireles 55s 7.0 W F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-29 · 2SCWB-MEIRELES 70NW TU 55&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Bimberg
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-22 · 2SCWB-MEIRELES 70NW TU 55&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Bimberg
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-07-15 · 2SCWB-MEIRELES 70NW TU 55&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-07-08 · 2SCWB-MEIRELES 70NW TU 55&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Stecker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-17 · 4NAC-HAD 35 DW TU 40&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-06-10 · 2SCWB-MEIRELES 70NW TU 55&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Bimberg
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-06-03 · 2SCWB-MEIRELES 70NW TU 55&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Bimberg
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-27 · 4NAC-HAD 35 DW TU 40&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Pilat
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-05-20 · 4NAC-HAD 35 DW TU 40&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Bimberg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-08-06 · 4SCWB-MEIRELES AD55&O TU 70 NW SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nisha Meireles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 56.7% of games
7.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 71% of the time
#1 Doubles
71%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams