← Search

Michele Bracken

— year-end
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Michele Bracken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2021-08-25 · 4LIFE-ANDERSON W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Georgina Kilbride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2021-08-18 · 4LIFE-ANDERSON W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katherine Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2021-08-16 · 4LIFE-ANDERSON W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Zachary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Jennifer Crager / Suresha Bandara
2019-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy McCaughtry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2019-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Georgina Kilbride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2019-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Berwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Rachel Seeley / Jennifer Hindman
2019-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Veronika Stanovaya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2019-06-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2019-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jane Mellesmoen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Zagrodzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2019-06-03 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2019-03-03 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
40%
4W–6L · 49.7% of games
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Singles
21%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match
#3 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams