← Search

Katherine Weaver

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Troy, MI
2.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 14W–21L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history35 matches
L
2023-11-18 · 1TROY-VONDELL 5.5W COMBO SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · with Jane Mellesmoen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-11-04 · 1TROY-VONDELL 5.5W COMBO SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · with Theresa Farley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-18 · 4WESS-BEESLEY AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Seals
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-06 · 4WESS-BEESLEY AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Beesley-Schick
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-23 · 4WESS-BEESLEY AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Winters
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-12-04 · 2LIFE-HOVEY 55W COMBO SEM · #1 Doubles · with Sheryl Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2021-11-06 · 2LIFE-HOVEY 55W COMBO SEM · #3 Doubles · with Jacqueline Weaver
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2021-09-01 · 4LIFE-ANDERSON W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Georgina Kilbride
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-08-18 · 4LIFE-ANDERSON W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michele Bracken
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2021-08-09 · 4LIFE-ANDERSON W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Zachary
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-07-26 · 6TROY-PULFORD 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Zachary
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-06-21 · 6TROY-PULFORD 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Monica Green
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 49.1% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer