← Search

Cheryl von Zielinski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vero Beach, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 20W–10L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history30 matches
W
2026-04-04 · Boulevard/Kalish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Spahr
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · Boulevard/Kalish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Spahr
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · Boulevard/Kalish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Henig
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · Boulevard/Kalish · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Spahr
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-12-09 · Winner/Boulevard/McLaurin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Kushner
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-02 · Winner/Boulevard/McLaurin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Blando
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-18 · Winner/Boulevard/McLaurin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anita Venner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-14 · Winner/Boulevard/McLaurin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anita Venner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-05-20 · Boulevard/Kalish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Beck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-29 · Boulevard/Kalish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Beck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-15 · Boulevard/Spahr · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janel Griffin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-15 · Boulevard/Spahr · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Embt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal