← Search

Catherine Spahr

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vero Beach, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 41W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history82 matches
W
2026-04-04 · Boulevard/Kalish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl von Zielinski
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Boulevard Rally Cats/Blando · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hofmeister
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · Boulevard Rally Cats/Blando · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Nitardy
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · Boulevard/Kalish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janel Griffin
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · Boulevard/Kalish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl von Zielinski
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · Boulevard Rally Cats/Blando · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Nitardy
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-17 · Boulevard/Kalish · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl von Zielinski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-18 · Winner/Boulevard/McLaurin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Orthober
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-04 · Winner/Boulevard/McLaurin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Orthober
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-03-08 · Boulevard/Spahr · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Packard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-03-01 · Boulevard/Rally Cats-Blando · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Orthober
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-22 · Boulevard/Spahr · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Croom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 53.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 53.4% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert