← Search

Emily Atherine

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WATERVILLE, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 94W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history166 matches
L
2026-09-12 · NWO 40&Over 6.0MX Traver · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Traver mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · NWO 40&Over 6.0MX Traver · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Mason mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Abodeely/Hanus-Springfield · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Pitt championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Abodeely/Hanus-Springfield · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Pitt championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Abodeely/Hanus-Springfield · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Pitt
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Beach PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Razzoog
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Cable/Cunningham-PTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kessler
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Abodeely/Hanus-Springfield · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Pitt
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Hartzell/Middaugh-PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janeen Middaugh
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Beach PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Pitt
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Cable/Cunningham-PTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Pitt
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Abodeely/Hanus-Springfield · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Pitt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.3% of games
3.0
66%
62W–32L · 56.6% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.3% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
6.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.3% of games
6.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert