Joseph Pecos
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
107 matches · 51W–56L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history107 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2024
NNM 7.0 Mixed - Mufti - HP
NNM 7.0 JC - Brock
NNM 3.5M Tanoan - Zottnick
NNM 6.0MX Tanoan - Suo-Anttila
NNM 7.0MX HP - Brock
NNM 7.0MX JC - Goldstein
NNM 3.0M Tanoan - Zottnick
NNM 3.5M Tanoan - Kniskern
NNM 3.5M Tanoan - Zottnick
NNM 6.0MX Tanoan - Suo-Anttila
NNM 7.0M Tanoan - Zottnick
NNM 7.0MX HP - James
NNM 3.0M HP - Suo-Anttila
NNM 6.0MX Tanoan - Kniskern
NNM3.0M40_SuoAnttila_HP
NNM3.0M18_Kniskern_HP
NNM3.0M40_Kniskern_HP
NNM6.0X18_Kniskern_HP
NNM6.0X40_Kniskern_HP
NNM7.0X40_Zhou_HP
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
51.4%
18W–17L · 50.4% of games
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.3% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 50.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Champions keep playing until they get it right.