← Search

Daniel Norton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Newton, MA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 28W–41L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history69 matches
W
2026-07-16 · LFNT:Natick:Jreige/Edwards · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Jreige
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · LFNT:Natick:Jreige/Edwards · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Jreige
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · LFNT:Natick:Jreige/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Marks
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-5
W
2026-06-04 · LFNT:Natick:Jreige/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Marks
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · LFNT:Natick:Jreige/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Friedman
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-08-08 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike McGonagle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-10 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Cunningham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-07-20 · LFW:Longfellow:Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Javier Segovia
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2023-07-13 · LFW:Longfellow:Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Loukovnikov
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-07-10 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ralph Pinto
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-07-03 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Driscoll
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-26 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ralph Pinto
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.7% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.1%
13W–22L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams