← Search

Jeff Jacobson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sudbury, MA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
13 matches · 7W–6L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history13 matches
W
2026-09-26 · LFNT:Natick:Pinto · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ralph Pinto championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-09-25 · LFNT:Natick:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Bower championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · LFNT:Natick:Pinto · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Heide
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
Default
2026-07-09 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naresh Mysore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · LFNT:Natick:Pinto · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Bryant
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naresh Mysore
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · LFW:Wayland Green:Klein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Romesh Subramanian
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Sullivan
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Conroy
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-23 · Mediterra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Gassner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2022-02-02 · Mediterra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Rea
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-01-12 · Mediterra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Mahoney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.5% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.9% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer