← Search

Deana Hughes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
333 matches · 165W–168L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history333 matches
L
2026-10-28 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenni Falkner
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-26 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi McDuff
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-23 · West Homewood - Hollis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Tippett
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-19 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Hoerner
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · West Homewood - Hollis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Lynn Warren
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi McDuff
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-02 · West Homewood - Hollis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Tippett
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-28 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Hoerner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-18 · West Homewood - Hollis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Lynn Warren
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-04 · West Homewood - Hollis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Tippett
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Homewood - Daugherty 6.5 Day · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer McCain
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-03 · West Homewood - Hancock · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Gray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams93 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.3% of games
3.0
54.8%
114W–94L · 52% of games
3.5
15.4%
4W–22L · 37.1% of games
5.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 49.5% of games
6.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
153 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
121 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
53 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova