← Search

Elizabeth Gray

— year-end
32 matches · 17W–15L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Elizabeth Gray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Homewood - Trammell / Granger · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · VCC - Smith · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Townes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · VCC - Smith · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Abbey Ginter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · West Homewood - Hancock · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Deana Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · VCC - Smith · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · West Homewood - Hancock · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Deana Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · VCC - Smith · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sara Stromeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-28 · VCC - Feld · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-01-21 · VCC - Feld · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Landon Nast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-01-20 · BH - Trammell/Jeffries · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams16 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 51.2% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova