← Search

Ashley Spink

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
371 matches · 251W–120L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history371 matches
L
2026-10-25 · JTC/Sager · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Garcia-Crespo
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-22 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elize VanZyl
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · JTC/Sager · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Garcia-Crespo
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7
W
2026-09-20 · DB/Brunsting · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Philicia Endelman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anita Rajasekhar
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-13 · DB/Justis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Harloff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Yonge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-27 · Alachua/Spink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Faun Carlson championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · Alachua/Spink · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Giordano championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Alachua/Spink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Bertran championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Alachua/Spink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Faun Carlson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Yonge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 52.6% of games
2.5
90%
18W–2L · 66.8% of games
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 58.9% of games
3.5
57%
49W–37L · 52.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 37% of games
5.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 59.2% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.7% of games
6.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 55.3% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.4% of games
7.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.4% of games
2.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 66.7% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
42W–12L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
78%
39W–11L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
138 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
70 matches
#1 Singles
3%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova