← Search

Judith Bertran

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 204W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history281 matches
L
2026-10-25 · DB/Brunsting · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Philicia Endelman
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-18 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Neelands
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-18 · DB/Brunsting · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Gerling
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-09-13 · DB/Brunsting · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Faun Carlson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · DB/Justis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DALTON IEIRI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · FK/The Breakers-Barlet · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Yonge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Alachua/Spink · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Christie Ybanez championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Alachua/Spink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Christie Ybanez championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · Alachua/Spink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Spink championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Alachua/Spink · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Adkins championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · Alachua/Spink · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Harloff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
100%
11W–0L · 71.1% of games
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.2% of games
3.0
80.5%
33W–8L · 60.8% of games
3.5
71.4%
55W–22L · 57.9% of games
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 58.5% of games
5.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 59.5% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 52.6% of games
6.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 55.5% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 62% of games
7.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 63.7% of games
2.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.6% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
50 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova