← Search

Jenny Neelands

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gainesville, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
354 matches · 255W–99L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history354 matches
W
2026-10-25 · JTC/Sager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abigail Dellovade
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-22 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Justis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-18 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Judith Bertran
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-17 · JTC/Sager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wheeler Crawford
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Garcia-Crespo
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-14 · JTC/Rodriguez · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sheena Prasad
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-04 · JTC/Sager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abigail Dellovade
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Justis
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-18 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Ghiaseddin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
Default
2026-09-13 · DB/Madorsky - Grip & Rip · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Justis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · DB/Justis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Brad Case mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-08-17 · DB/Justis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Brad Case mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
0.0
95.5%
21W–1L · 70.1% of games
2.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 68.7% of games
3.0
75.6%
34W–11L · 67.4% of games
3.5
80%
24W–6L · 63.1% of games
4.0
66.7%
44W–22L · 55.2% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games
5.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.4% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.1% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 64.4% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 64% of games
8.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.5% of games
6.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
78.9%
30W–8L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 48.1% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
76 matches
#1 Singles
13%
46 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
9 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova