← Search

John Compton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 67W–101L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history168 matches
L
2026-10-11 · CHI E 55M7.0 2.MTC Brown Sat 7 $34.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Sanders
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-27 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregory Franzo championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Engeln championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-26 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Engeln championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-16 · CDTA S M55&O7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sun 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Grabow Duignan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Siegel
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Smith championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · CDTA S TriMLo 4.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Rowe
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · CDTA S M55&O7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sun 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DANIELLE ARENDS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Gork
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · CDTA S TriMLo 4.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Patrick Casey
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
48.3%
29W–31L · 51.2% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.8% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
28.3%
17W–43L · 40.8% of games
6.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
41 matches
Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams