Jeff Siegel
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
166 matches · 58W–108L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history166 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
CHI E 18M3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sat 3 $34.5
CHI E 40M3.0 3.Wilm Siegel Sat 7 $20
CHI E 55M6.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 11 $20
CDTA E 18&OM3.0 1MTC Brown1 Sat 3 $33.5
CDTA E 40&OM3.0 2Cent Siegel Sat 7 $20
CDTA S 18&OM3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sat 3 $33.5
CDTA S 40&OM3.0 4.Wilm Siegel Sat 3 $20
CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20
CDTA W 18&OM3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sat 3 $33.5
CDTA W 40&OM3.0 2.Wlmt Siegel Sat 3 $20
CDTA W 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5
CHI F CX7.5 2.MTC Brown Sat 7 $34.5
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
36.4%
44W–77L · 45% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 14.3% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 43.5% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
25 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.