← Search

Daniel Brosk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 18W–29L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history47 matches
W
2026-10-24 · CHI E 18M3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $34.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · CHI E 40M3.0 3.Wilm Siegel Sat 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Dominguez
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-12 · CHI E 18M3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $34.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Rowe
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
W
N/A
2026-07-26 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 4.Wilm Siegel Sat 3 $20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam la France
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 4.Wilm Siegel Sat 3 $20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Siegel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · CDTA S 18&OM3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Nothman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 4.Wilm Siegel Sat 3 $20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Siegel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-14 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 4.Wilm Siegel Sat 3 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Heisler
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-21 · CDTA W 18&OM3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $33.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Miller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · CDTA W 18&OM3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $33.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Leibsker
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · CDTA W 40&OM3.0 2.Wlmt Siegel Sat 3 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Siegel
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-01 · CDTA W 18&OM3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $33.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Rowe
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.0
38.3%
18W–29L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert