← Search

Keith Chasteen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pell City, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
326 matches · 239W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history326 matches
L
2026-10-29 · MBY - Sansing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Cohn
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Blair championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jimmy Warren championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-08 · MBY - Sansing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Cohn
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · MBY - Sansing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Sims
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-24 · MBY - Sansing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Cohn
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-18 · MBY - Sansing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Mills
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · BH - Chasteen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Mills championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-11 · BH - Chasteen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Nguyen championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · MBY - Sansing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rusty Sansing
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-31 · BHRC - Robertson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Blalock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · BHRC - Chasteen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Alverson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 70% of games
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 61.5% of games
4.0
63.2%
67W–39L · 53.6% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
10W–0L · 67.8% of games
7.5
79.6%
43W–11L · 62.2% of games
8.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 55.1% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games
7.0mixed
92.9%
26W–2L · 66.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.1%
37W–11L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
72 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal