← Search

Jim Blalock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hoover, AL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 119W–78L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history197 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Hoover Met - Burdette · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-22 · Hoover Met - Burdette · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Fuller
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-08 · Hoover Met - Burdette · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dakota Harris
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-05 · Hoover Met - Burdette · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan North
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Default
2026-09-14 · TU - Burdette · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tyler Cohen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chase Robertson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chase Robertson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chase Robertson championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · TU - Burdette · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Watkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · BHRC - Robertson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Keith Chasteen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-11 · BHRC - Robertson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Keith Chasteen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Frederick · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Preston Scott Blakeley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 60.9% of games
4.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 61.2% of games
4.5
58%
40W–29L · 54.2% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.1% of games
8.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 67.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Singles
13%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
24 matches
Singles
11%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams