← Search

Carlos Passi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, NY
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 15W–64L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history79 matches
L
2025-12-06 · Armonk Tennis Club - Jimenez · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eloina Cortes mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-22 · Armonk Tennis Club - Jimenez · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ilana Webster mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-02 · Armonk Tennis Club - Jimenez · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eloina Cortes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-17 · Armonk Tennis Club - Jimenez · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eloina Cortes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-08 · Armonk Tennis Club - Jimenez · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yelizaveta Bereza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-20 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott van Camp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-08-15 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Nathanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-03 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Francisco Barahona
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-27 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marion Veteska
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-27 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Nathanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-5
L
2024-06-09 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jay Shapiro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-23 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with STUART LONGMAN
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
28.6%
8W–20L · 36.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 19.8% of games
6.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.6% of games
7.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.6% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–19L · 25.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova