← Search

STUART LONGMAN

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ridgefield, CT
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 10W–52L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history62 matches
L
2024-08-20 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phillip Raclyn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-08-15 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Francisco Barahona
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-03 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marion Veteska
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-07-27 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott van Camp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-27 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott van Camp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-01 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott van Camp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-23 · CRRC: Roasted Chestnuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carlos Passi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-26 · Chestnut Ridge: Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carlos Passi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-19 · Chestnut Ridge: Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed Levinstim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-18 · Chestnut Ridge · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phillip Raclyn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-27 · Chestnut Ridge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Swamy Sunkara
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-12-02 · Chestnut Ridge · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Weiss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 39.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 29.7% of games
6.0
30%
6W–14L · 42.4% of games
7.0
0%
0W–13L · 32.7% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe