← Search

Richard Paley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scarsdale, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 9W–27L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history36 matches
L
2025-08-04 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Cohen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-28 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-07 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Levine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-01 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Hoffman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-05-19 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Hoffman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-08-29 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Cohen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-08-15 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Cohen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2024-07-18 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Cohen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-27 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Cohen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-05-09 · Eastern/Catto/65&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Fligel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-08-18 · Armonk Tennis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Nieminen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2022-08-16 · Armonk Tennis · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Nieminen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
6.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 30.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King