← Search

Travis Bakai

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 59W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history79 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Ackermann-Rigby (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Welton
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · Ackermann-Rigby (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Geerling
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-10-04 · Ackermann-Rigby (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Wright
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · Ackermann-Rigby (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Geerling
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-5
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aditya Gupta championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Welton championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Geerling championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malik Hagens
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
Default
2026-07-07 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Welton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malik Hagens
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Geerling championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Geerling championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 63.5% of games
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 54.1% of games
4.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 58.5% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
15 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert