← Search

Mark Hopkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Auburn, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 58W–44L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Eccles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kareem Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-31 · Eccles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kareem Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-24 · Eccles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liz Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-24 · Eccles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liz Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-29 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Nelson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Nelson championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-28 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Ritter championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Eccles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danielle Kruse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · KS/Lobatos/18&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Landen Lobatos-Dick championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · KS/Lobatos/18&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Seitz championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · Eccles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liz Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · Eccles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liz Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 36% of games
3.5
40%
10W–15L · 48.7% of games
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 69.5% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 64% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert