← Search

Barbara Meyers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 10W–11L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history21 matches
L
2024-08-08 · BM YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-01 · BM YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-13 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Powell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-05-30 · PH RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-08-03 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Rosen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-13 · PH RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rengel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2023-06-29 · PH RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Brandon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2023-06-17 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Fritzinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-06-09 · PH RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-05-26 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-12 · PH RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Gallagher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-08-29 · PH RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne McCaslin
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 23.8% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 56.5% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe