← Search

Lynne McCaslin

DENVER, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
69 matches · 38W–31L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Lynne sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Lynne is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lynne has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Lynne has gone from the 94th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.4% of games
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 47% of games
6.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 62.7% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
Aimee Petri / Kim Betzner
2022-09-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin McDonald
−0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Jami Jensen / Sandy Courtney
2022-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Meyers
−0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Carrie Erickson / Heather Coker
2022-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Powell
−0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Kelley Treichel / Anne Fanganello
2022-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Powell
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
EMILY JENNINGS / Carrie Hantge
2022-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Powell
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Chiarme Campbell / Jenny Tenney
2022-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Powell
+0.049better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Robin Cann / Patricia Martin
2022-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Powell
+0.049better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
2-1
L
Kimberly Borchelt / Kim Rachwalski
2022-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Meyers
−0.075below expectation — took 0% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Marla Gordon / Kris Hansen
2022-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Powell
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Ginger Angell / Jennifer Henkel
2022-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Ballard
−0.002about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Lesley Kerns / Judi Harrischamps
2022-06-24 · #3 Doubles · with Martha Tucker
−0.021below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Jennifer Manta / Robyn Jensen
2022-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Gallagher
+0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.