Teams

PH TEAL

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-14vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesNhung Van / Lynne Paris vs Kathe Gouin / Robin Cann3-6, 2-6
2023-06-07vs PH YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin McDonald / Nhung Van vs Shawna Morgan / Christina Quigley2-6, 3-6
2023-05-31vs CACM BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin McDonald / Lynne Paris vs Cathy O'Neill / Betty Murray4-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs LEBTC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Powell / Melodie Harris vs Sandy Stocker / LISA HAGEN4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNhung Van / Heather Fleck vs Jeanne Dearth / Margie Walsh6-3, 6-4
2023-05-17vs HG BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Powell / Melodie Harris vs Maria Blakney / Melody Sattizahn6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMindy Slater / Lynne Paris vs Theresa Hendrix / Camille Wright4-6, 1-6
2023-05-10vs SS-H GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynne McCaslin / Nhung Van vs Patti Coker / Tracy Pursell4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Whitmore / Melodie Harris vs Cindy Wells / Carol Lugo1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-03vs LEBTC GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesColleen Powell / Nhung Van vs Diana Nice / Brooke Sterling6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Whitmore / Lynne Paris vs Ileen Cummiskey / Amy Quinette6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Melodie Harris
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Grace
published
3.13
Nhung Van
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Lynne Paris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Kristin McDonald
published
2.96
Colleen Powell
published 3.5
Lynne McCaslin
published 3
Elizabeth Whitmore
published
Mindy Slater
published
Suzanne Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Grace + Kristin McDonald4253% games+5.8% vs expected
Rebecca Grace + Colleen Powell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melodie Harris
87W–106L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Rebecca Grace
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Nhung Van
117W–95L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lynne Paris
104W–105L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Kristin McDonald
10W–26L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.97
3.5
Colleen Powell
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Lynne McCaslin
38W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Elizabeth Whitmore
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mindy Slater
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Perkins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.