Teams

PH GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs CK REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesWendi Ballard / Jessica Harms vs Christie Bibeau / Mary Vrabel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLori Hearty vs Nancy Hong6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSimne Langton / Noel Litchkowski vs Joyce Naylon / Laura Hoganson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynne McCaslin / Colleen Powell vs Robin Cann / Patricia Martin2-1
2022-07-20vs KC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesTricia Vath / Lori Hearty vs Teresa Granath / Anne Fox2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaryn Snee vs Elizabeth Low6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNoel Litchkowski / Wendi Ballard vs Dianne Sandy / Marjie Tokarski2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Meyers / Lynne McCaslin vs Kimberly Borchelt / Kim Rachwalski0-6, 0-6
2022-07-14vs NJ REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKristin McDonald / Katie Mohler vs Linda Prior / April DeLauro5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSimne Langton vs Anar DEMARCO6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTricia Vath / Wendi Ballard vs Kira Moore / Holly Bristol6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesColleen Powell / Lynne McCaslin vs Marla Gordon / Kris Hansen5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-07vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSimne Langton / Lori Hearty vs Christina Schwartz / Jennifer Jackson7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Mohler vs Susana Wanken2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristin McDonald / Tricia Vath vs MISSY GOLDBERG / Sandy Stocker3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWendi Ballard / Lynne McCaslin vs Ginger Angell / Jennifer Henkel0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-02vs PH REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesWendi Ballard / Jessica Harms vs Kori White / Christy Brant6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTricia Vath vs Gina Maestas6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Fleck / Kristin McDonald vs Nhung Van / Christina Quigley4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Perkins / Colleen Powell vs Libby Conlin / Lori Silliman6-3, 6-4
2022-06-16vs LEBTC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristin McDonald / Tricia Vath vs Cathy Sorensen / Olivia Zuncic7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJessica Harms vs Michelle Davis6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSimne Langton / Lori Hearty vs Claudia Swanson / Gretchen Burr7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Perkins / Heather Fleck vs Brooke Sterling / Jessica Seidlitz3-6, 5-7
2022-06-09vs KC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaryn Snee / Jessica Harms vs Dawn Robbins / Cara Owen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSimne Langton / Katie Mohler vs Leslie Doessel / Shannon Buhl6-7, 4-3
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Perkins / Heather Fleck vs Sally Heaton / Beth Beers3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Simne Langton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Katie Mohler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.17
Jessica Harms
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.96
Kristin McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Colleen Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lynne McCaslin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Heather Fleck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Karyn Snee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lori Hearty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Noel Litchkowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tricia Vath
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Wendi Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karyn Snee + Jessica Harms6358% games+9.0% vs expected
Lynne McCaslin + Colleen Powell5449% games+5.2% vs expected
Kristin McDonald + Katie Mohler4453% games+2.0% vs expected
Kristin McDonald + Simne Langton6944% games−2.7% vs expected
Suzanne Perkins + Heather Fleck3354% gamesnot enough data
Wendi Ballard + Jessica Harms404 matchesnot enough data
Kristin McDonald + Tricia Vath224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin McDonald + Noel Litchkowski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Simne Langton
67W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Katie Mohler
45W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Jessica Harms
62W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Kristin McDonald
63W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Colleen Powell
67W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Lynne McCaslin
43W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Heather Fleck
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karyn Snee
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Hearty
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Noel Litchkowski
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Perkins
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Vath
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendi Ballard
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.