Teams

KC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs PH REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesDianne Sandy / Anne Fox vs Nhung Van / Arlene Cole6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Low vs Kimberley Silverman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Borchelt / Kim Rachwalski vs Christy Brant / Gina Maestas3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHolley Miller / Marjie Tokarski vs Libby Conlin / Shawna Morgan6-7, 0-2
2022-07-20vs PH GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesTeresa Granath / Anne Fox vs Tricia Vath / Lori Hearty6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Low vs Karyn Snee7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDianne Sandy / Marjie Tokarski vs Noel Litchkowski / Wendi Ballard6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKimberly Borchelt / Kim Rachwalski vs Barbara Meyers / Lynne McCaslin6-0, 6-0
2022-07-14vs LEBTC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesTeresa Granath / Dianne Sandy vs Cami Schaefer / Cathy Sorensen6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAnne Fox vs Ann Patel6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarjie Tokarski / Kim Rachwalski vs Kathleen Samuelli / Olivia Zuncic6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Reed / Holley Miller vs Jessica Seidlitz / Michelle Davis5-7, 0-6
2022-07-07vs KC NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarnie Desmarteau / Marjie Tokarski vs Leslie Doessel / Julia Zawalski6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Fox vs Cara Owen2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Granath / Elizabeth Low vs Sally Heaton / Beth Beers6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHolley Miller / Leslie Reed vs Laurie Lopez / Dawn Robbins2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-23vs NJ REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesDianne Sandy / Marjie Tokarski vs Kris Hansen / Anar DEMARCO6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMarnie Desmarteau vs Courtney Gaudet4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Rachwalski / Elizabeth Low vs Erin Manzolillo / Kira Moore6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolley Miller / Teresa Granath vs Renee Richker / Holly Bristol6-4, 6-4
2022-06-16vs LEBTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesDianne Sandy / Marnie Desmarteau vs Susana Wanken / Elenita Marsan2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Fox vs Johanna Neucks6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTeresa Granath / Kim Rachwalski vs Christina Schwartz / Jennifer Jackson0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Low / Leslie Reed vs Maria Banta / Ginger Angell6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs CK REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnne Fox / Dianne Sandy vs Joyce Naylon / Robin Cann6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesStacey Persichetti vs Courtney Carignan0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarnie Desmarteau / Marjie Tokarski vs Sandi Plude / Patty Carstens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Low / Leslie Reed vs Janet Burns / Alice Soderman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Dianne Sandy
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Anne Fox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.51
Elizabeth Low
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Marnie Desmarteau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Marjie Tokarski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Teresa Granath
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Stacey Persichetti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Kim Rachwalski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Holley Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kimberly Borchelt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Thorp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Sandy + Marjie Tokarski6071% games+15.4% vs expected
Teresa Granath + Anne Fox6074% games+15.2% vs expected
Marnie Desmarteau + Kim Rachwalski6355% games+14.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Low + Stacey Persichetti3258% games+6.3% vs expected
Marnie Desmarteau + Teresa Granath5357% games+5.7% vs expected
Dianne Sandy + Anne Fox311259% games+4.6% vs expected
Marnie Desmarteau + Dianne Sandy7359% games+4.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Low + Teresa Granath6352% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dianne Sandy
86W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Anne Fox
103W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Elizabeth Low
90W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Marnie Desmarteau
62W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Marjie Tokarski
84W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Teresa Granath
81W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Stacey Persichetti
39W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kim Rachwalski
103W–116L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Holley Miller
30W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
Kimberly Borchelt
24W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Thorp
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.