Teams

LEBTC NAVY

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs LEBTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesJessica Seidlitz / Michelle Davis vs Jocelyn Bills / MISSY GOLDBERG0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Susana Wanken2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesOlivia Zuncic / Brooke Sterling vs LISA HAGEN / Sandy Stocker2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCami Schaefer / Kathleen Samuelli vs Ginger Angell / Jennifer Henkel6-3, 6-1
2022-07-14vs KC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesCami Schaefer / Cathy Sorensen vs Teresa Granath / Dianne Sandy2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Anne Fox7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Olivia Zuncic vs Marjie Tokarski / Kim Rachwalski7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJessica Seidlitz / Michelle Davis vs Leslie Reed / Holley Miller7-5, 6-0
2022-07-13vs CK REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesCami Schaefer / Kathleen Samuelli vs Jordana Sutphin / Christie Bibeau2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Courtney Carignan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Jessica Seidlitz vs Robin Cann / Alice Soderman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesOlivia Zuncic / Cathy Sorensen vs Joyce Naylon / Patty Carstens2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-07vs PH REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Brooke Sterling vs Ming Hall / Cheri Bradley3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Arlene Cole7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCami Schaefer / Claudia Swanson vs Christina Quigley / Christy Brant6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJessica Seidlitz / Gretchen Burr vs Nhung Van / Shawna Morgan4-6, 0-6
2022-06-23vs KC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesCami Schaefer / Claudia Swanson vs Cara Owen / Robin Woelfel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Burr / Ann Patel vs Abigail Lee / Leslie Doessel6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOlivia Zuncic / Kathleen Samuelli vs Beth Beers / Anne Fioretto6-3, 6-0
2022-06-16vs PH GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Sorensen / Olivia Zuncic vs Kristin McDonald / Tricia Vath6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Gretchen Burr vs Simne Langton / Lori Hearty6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Sterling / Jessica Seidlitz vs Suzanne Perkins / Heather Fleck6-3, 7-5
2022-06-09vs NJ REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Cathy Sorensen vs Courtney Gaudet / April DeLauro6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGretchen Burr vs Holly Bristol6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Jessica Seidlitz vs Erin Manzolillo / Kris Hansen6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Ann Patel
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.34
Jessica Seidlitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brooke Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Cami Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Gretchen Burr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Kathleen Samuelli
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cathy Sorensen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Olivia Zuncic
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Sorensen + Olivia Zuncic4451% games+7.1% vs expected
Brooke Sterling + Claudia Swanson9754% games+4.0% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Jessica Seidlitz4748% games+2.2% vs expected
Brooke Sterling + Kathleen Samuelli71348% games−0.4% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Cami Schaefer2450% games−1.5% vs expected
Claudia Swanson + Gretchen Burr131351% games−1.6% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Claudia Swanson151148% games−1.7% vs expected
Brooke Sterling + Olivia Zuncic5646% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Patel
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Jessica Seidlitz
41W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Brooke Sterling
36W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cami Schaefer
28W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Gretchen Burr
86W–95L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Swanson
67W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kathleen Samuelli
90W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Cathy Sorensen
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Olivia Zuncic
23W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.