← Search

Philip Jones

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 157W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Philip Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Emilee Cox championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-11 · The Chancla · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seiji Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · The Chancla · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-21 · The Chancla · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Enoch Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · The Chancla · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-06 · Six Seven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · Harmon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nyla Kress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-17 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nyla Kress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-08 · Six Seven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-01 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nyla Kress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
71%
44W–18L · 58.9% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 60.9% of games
4.0
69.6%
39W–17L · 58.3% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 65.1% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.9%
18W–16L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
41 matches
#2 Singles
8%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer