Search

Matt Ware

PROSPECT, KY
0.0 year-end
56 matches · 29W–27L · seasons 20192024
Where Matt sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Matt is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.2% of games
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 61% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
Brian MacDuff / Bernardo Savitt
2024-08-15 · #1 Male Doubles · 8.0 · with Cody McKee
0.031below expectation — took 40% of games against 54% expected
6-4
W
Tyler Soderholm / Julian McOmie
2024-02-25 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Cody McKee
+0.062better than expected — took 67% of games against 39% expected
6-3
L
Nelson Chen / Curtis Lan
2024-02-04 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Myers
+0.002about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4
W
Dave McCarthy / Stephanie Kornblummixed
2023-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Blakely Tsurusaki
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Matthew Scher / Mike Joslin
2023-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Maung
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Kevin Kang / Lynn Siebert
2023-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Rodriguez
0.006about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2022-12-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Sahlin
+0.000better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-10-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Corey Golden
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
David Jones / Vincent Beasleychamps
2022-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Samuel Bradley
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-08-12 · #3 Doubles · with Winston Liu
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Vinh Nguyen / Jonathan Yuchamps
2022-08-12 · #2 Doubles · with Roman Loukiantchikov
+0.001about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2022-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Roman Loukiantchikov
0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.