← Search

Jacob Dyer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 107W–45L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history152 matches
W
2026-10-22 · Westwood Thundercats - Raymond · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hupe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-18 · The Westwood Alwinners - Alwine · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rina Dyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-4
L
2026-10-13 · Westwood Thundercats - Raymond · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Moredock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-01 · Westwood Thundercats - Raymond · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hupe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Hause
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · Westwood Brickley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dutch Jones
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Szalay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Westwood Brickley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean DiBlasi
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shailesh Khatri championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shailesh Khatri championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Herrin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Herrin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 70% of games
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 68.1% of games
4.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 51.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.1% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
9W–0L · 68.9% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.8% of games
6.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 72.4% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 61.3% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams