← Search

Jennifer Shaffer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 105W–53L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history158 matches
W
2026-11-02 · MTC Triple Threat Mixed Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-20 · MTC Triple Threat Mixed Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-01 · MTC Triple Threat Mixed Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-10 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Brady
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pitts
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hoover
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-23 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pitts
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kratzer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pitts
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · MTC Cousineau · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Nothnagle
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · MTC Cousineau · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.3% of games
3.5
93.3%
28W–2L · 66.5% of games
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.2% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.6% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
91.7%
22W–2L · 64.8% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#1 Singles
13%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer